Article

Breaking our bad habits

September 15, 2022

The monkey on our backs


Trust me on this: nothing gets a group of people buzzing like sharing your favourite market research story.


Mine is when strategists at AMV BBDO
sent in a guy in a gorilla suit to walk around a supermarket on a Saturday morning. They wanted to prove to Sainsbury’s that consumers were shopping on autopilot, and paying so little attention that they wouldn’t even notice a giant monkey doing his weekly shop.


No one noticed the gorilla. The evidence led to Sainsbury's “Try Something New Today” strap-line, which
increased revenue by £2.5 billion . Everyone won a lot of awards.


This story (and an
overwhelming amount of data available to anyone with Google) is great evidence of just how hard it is to crack a habitual purchase cycle.


Progressive challenger brands (especially in FMCG) know this all too well. 


Even when a challenger product is objectively better, more ethical, or offers greater value than big-brand competitors, shoppers will overlook them in favour of a simpler purchase decision. 


There are levers to change this behaviour, and at Finn we spend our days pulling them.


But now a once-a-decade opportunity arises.





A scary opportunity


As we head into an era of increasing inflation and economic disarray, it might seem like the deck is stacked ever more against challenger brands. Big brands have deeper pockets, more established distribution, and more mental availability .


But economic downturns represent a huge opportunity for challenger brands to break the habit cycle.


We know that in times of recession, consumers tend to
reevaluate what constitutes an essential purchase , and what constitutes a treat. 


“Treat” purchases such as electronics are pushed back to a time when money isn’t as tight. Whereas “essentials” (food and drink for example) are reevaluated, to either reduce cost or find smaller, lower-cost treats.


The opportunity for challenger brands is to interrupt a portion of these freshly-awoken sleep shoppers as they consider their transition options, and show them the value that they offer as an “treat” upgrade.


If they can divert just a fraction of these transitory shoppers into their buyer base, it can mean huge proportional growth.





Three steps out of sleepwalking


FMCG challenger brands that succeed will do three things.


Firstly they will ensure that their messaging clearly targets their benefits when compared to the established brands they want to steal from. 


Many challenger brands make the mistake of seeing other challengers as their key competitors, and invest too much energy trying to win against them.


But if multiple small brands are growing in a category at once, this should be seen as a good thing not a threat. It will increase overall consumer interest in the category - pushing more shoppers out of autopilot.


Secondly, they will bring retail partners on board as collaborators.


Retailers will see a shift to own-label as an opportunity. They won’t be thrilled at the prospect of listing brands that are actively trying to compete with this shift. 


But progressive brands will be able to show retailers that they have tightly targeted audience segments, and that their products can sit alongside a mass shift to own-label, making a retailer’s offering more diverse and appealing without stealing profit.


Finally, they will cement distinction and begin to grow their own habitual buyers. 


Those of us who have made a New Year's resolution knows that forming a new habit is as hard as breaking an old one. Progressive brands can fast-forward this process by targeting their consumers from multiple angles to embed their brand as rapidly as possible during this window of opportunity.


This can be achieved through tactics such as loyalty and CRM programmes, content that offers real (yes, real) value to the consumer, and partnerships with brands in tangential categories.


The end-game for progressive FMCG challenger brands is to come out of the next few years with a base of consumers who are both genuinely engaged in the brand, and also habitually buying their products.


If successful, they will have achieved what a man in a gorilla suit couldn’t: breaking shoppers out of their habits and helping them make an informed choice.


share this

Related Articles

Related Articles

Yellow basket filled with assorted products on a bright yellow background FINN FMCG
By Richard Rawlins May 11, 2026
There’s no shortage of good products in FMCG. Walk any aisle or scroll any DTC site and most brands are more than ‘good enough’ ingredients are cleaner, packaging is on point, positioning is sharper than ever. And yet, most of them won’t scale. Not because the product isn’t right, but because the fundamentals of how they approach growth are. At a recent session with Barry Dawber, Sales & Marketing Director at Jason’s Sourdough, we unpacked some of the patterns behind the brands that do break through. What stood out wasn’t complexity, it was clarity, the same principles, applied properly, still win. Here are three that most brands either miss or execute too late. 1. They try to win in someone else’s category This is the most common mistake we see. Brands enter a category and immediately start playing by its rules, same language, same cues, same claims. It feels logical, but it’s also exactly why they get lost. The brands that break through don’t just compete, they create a new category to win. Barry talked about how Jason’s created a new ‘premium everyday’ sub-category. That’s not just positioning, it reframes the entire decision, removing the trade-off and creating a new expectation. That’s what most brands avoid because it feels riskier, but in reality competing head-on with established players is the risk. At Finn, we push brands hard on this. If you can’t clearly articulate the space you’re creating, not just the category you’re in, you’re going to struggle to scale. 2. They try to scale before they’ve earned attention Everyone wants scale, bigger campaigns, broader audiences, more reach. But scale without traction is just expensive noise. The brands that build properly start much narrower. They understand a specific audience deeply, show up where those people already are, and build credibility from the ground up. Barry shared how Jason’s tapped into the clean eating movement early, not with overproduced campaigns, but through relevant, credible content and the right voices. It worked because it felt authentic to the people it needed to land with. That’s the bit most brands rush past. They either miss the moment or try to appeal to everyone with everything all at once. From our side, this is where a lot of the work sits, identifying where attention already exists and how a brand can show up in a way that actually earns it. Win a niche properly and scale becomes far more efficient. Skip that step and you’re constantly fighting for attention and relevance. 3. They ignore the basics (and overcomplicate everything else) For all the noise around new channels and tactics, the fundamentals haven’t changed. Growth still comes down to two things - are you easy to think of, and are you easy to buy? Too many brands over-index on one. You see brands with distribution but no demand, sat on shelf not moving and others with strong engagement but nowhere to actually buy. The opportunity is in doing both, consistently. As distribution grows, communications need to grow with it, not sporadically or reactively, but in a way that builds familiarity over time. It’s basic, but it’s also where most brands fall down. So, what does this mean in practice? None of this is revolutionary, but it does require discipline. Where to play and how to win? Define the space you can credibly own Earn attention in a niche with a distinctive and disruptive clarity before trying to scale it Build distribution and awareness in tandem, scaling A&P investment as distribution is earned At Finn, this is where we see the biggest difference between brands that scale and brands that stall, not in how much they do but in how clearly they prioritise. What’s next We’ll be continuing the conversation at our next event in June, if you’d like to be notified when registration opens you can sign up here.
Channel 4 Skills Content Creatives programme creative talent recruitment
By Chris Weston October 21, 2025
Discover how Finn Agency partnered with Channel 4's Content Creatives programme to open doors for creative talent. Learn why diverse hiring builds better agencies.
Brand consistency FMCG marketing boring branding strategy
By Chris Weston August 20, 2025
Discover why brand consistency beats constant reinvention. Learn how Camden Hells, Red Bull and Innocent use boring consistency to win in FMCG.
ALL ARTICLES